I like Sattva Capital Corporation v Creston Moly Corporation et al [2014] 2 SCR 633.

The present English approach of treating interpretation as a pure question of law and so permitting appeals from interpretation decisions as a matter of course is wrong and unjust.

 

 Adam Kramer

 

Direct dial:+44 (0)20 7269 1101Switchboard:+44 (0)20 7831 8441

3 Verulam Buildings, Gray’s Inn, London, WC1R 5NT

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE

The contents of this email are CONFIDENTIAL and may be PRIVILEGED. If you are not the intended recipient, please telephone (020) 7831 8441 and delete this email.

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Jason W Neyers [mailto:jneyers@uwo.ca]
Sent: 15 January 2017 01:16
To: Harrington Matthew P.; obligations@uwo.ca
Subject: RE: Canada Supreme Court Greatest Hits in Contract

 

Dear Matthew:

 

How about the tendering cases developing the Contract A/Contract B analysis.

 

Sincerely,

 

 

Jason Neyers

Professor of Law

Faculty of Law

Western University

Law Building Rm 26

e. jneyers@uwo.ca

t. 519.661.2111 (x88435)

 

-----Original Message-----

From: Harrington Matthew P. [mailto:matthew.p.harrington@umontreal.ca]

Sent: Friday, January 13, 2017 11:37 AM

To: obligations@uwo.ca

Subject: Canada Supreme Court Greatest Hits in Contract

 

Dear Colleagues:

 

I’m doing a short piece on the Canada Supreme Court and the law of contract  with a bit of an historical focus.  I was wondering if you might be willing to share with me what you consider the court’s most significant contracts cases --- over the past 150 years ----  even if  the case has been overruled.

 

Thanks

 

Matt

 

-------------------------------

Matthew P Harrington

Professeur

Faculté de droit

Université de Montréal

514.343.6105

commonlaw.umontreal.ca

------------------------------